• Materials for Ceramics

EP Kaolin

Alternate Names: EPK, Edgar Plastic Kaolin, EPK Kaolin

Description: Plastic White Firing Kaolin

Notes

If you have issues getting this there are alternatives. If EPK is being used in a glaze and the percentage is low (e.g. 10-20%) switching to another will almost certainly have no effect on fired properties. However, slurry properties might change (EPK helped to gel them, making them thixotropic). It was also sticky. Both Grolleg and New Zealand kaolin impart similar properties.

In porcelains, EPK fires whiter than most other North American kaolins. If whiteness is important consider substituting New Zealand or Grolleg kaolins. Switching for Grolleg will improve body whiteness somewhat. Depending on the percentage, New Zealand kaolin could make the body fire much whiter. Of course, these two kaolins are much more expensive. A practical approach is to substitute whichever kaolin you have and assess fired color and plasticity. If plasticity is lost just add a little bentonite (e.g. 1-3%). If body workability is most important then #6 Tile kaolin is the right choice, it is the most plastic North American kaolin (actually, it might increase plasticity so much that the percentage of bentonite can be dropped).

EPK is a secondary water-washed kaolin mined in Florida, USA. EPK, when wet, is sticky and thixotropic, for these reasons it is considered by many to be the best North American kaolin for use in suspending ceramic glazes. 15-20% will normally make the glaze gel slightly, thus when a piece is immersed in the slurry and removed it drips very little and the wet glaze layer stays in place for the time it takes to dewater. And it dries relatively hard. Since EPK is very close to theoretical kaolin chemistry, it will substitute for any other such kaolins (e.g. Pioneer).

EPK is whiter burning than other American kaolins, this is due to its relatively low iron content, but more importantly the low level of TiO2: 0.4 TiO2. While this is high compared to Grolleg and Super Standard Porcelain kaolins (about 0.05%), but other common American kaolins have multiple times more TiO2 than EPK!

EPK has excellent casting properties. But it is not plastic enough for throwing bodies, it must be augmented by a more plastic kaolin (like 6Tile) or by a plasticizer like bentonite, smectite or hectorite. Or, if whiteness can be sacrificed, by a ball clay.

This material is mined and processed in Edgar Florida. It is extracted hydraulically (a high-pressure stream of water is used to wash the clay/sand mix from the bank into a small lake). The slurry is pumped and transported to vibrating screens that separate out the sand and grade it into sizes. The clay that passes the screens is pumped into a pond and settled with the aid of a flocculant. The slurry is then dried and the flocculant neutralized. The main product at the mine is high quality white sand, the clay is a byproduct. The company is confident that there are reserves for the next hundred years.

Related Information

What makes EP Kaolin unique? Are others as good?

In ceramics, EPK, or EP Kaolin, is used in clay bodies and glazes. Top right: Pure EPK is fairly plastic on wedging. But during the throwing process, it splits at the rim like this. The forming properties that it does have thus seem to be as much related to its stickiness and cohesion as plasticity. Without the help of bentonite or ball clay this would not be able to host the addition of feldspar and silica to make a usable porcelain or stoneware. But EPK shines in what it does as a slurry. Left: This slurry has been mixed to only 1.15 specific gravity and forms a thixotropic gel that clings to the spatula in an even layer. Bottom: This low specific gravity gel is thick enough that it will hold this heavy spatula vertical! Considering that our typical glazes have a specific gravity of 1.45 yet are still quite fluid it is evident just how much EPK can gel (and suspend a suspension). It is thus no surprise that it is the kaolin of choice in ceramic glazes. Are there other sticky kaolins that gel like this? Yes. Grolleg and New Zealand kaolin.

EPK fired test bars, data, certificate and our data

All of the test bars have been fired in this project to characterize a shipment of EPK (from cone 7-10 and 10R bottom to top). The dry and fired lengths and the dry and fired weights testdata was measured and entered into our Insight-live account. The results are shown in the red-titled columns (the drying shrinkage, firing shrinkage, absorption). The weights from the sieve analysis are also shown. And the calculation of water content of the plastic material (a very high 33.4%) and LOI (14.5%). We also like to take and upload a photo of the oversize material from the sieve analyses (to compare with past shipments) and of their manufacturers certificate of analysis.

Notice the data that the manufacturer considers important to include on the certificate that they send with the shipment: Particle size, particle surface area and moisture content. Of course, they would not be able to do all the tests we do. But our product is affected by the properties of the material, so we have to test.

#6 Tile Kaolin 2021 vs EP Kaolin 2020: Fired properties tell an unexpected story

These test bars are fired at cone 10 reduction (top) and 10, 9 and 8 oxidation (downward) - they demonstrate the importance of measuring physical properties. The charts for each show data for drying shrinkage, firing shrinkage and porosity (water absorption). The left bars are #6 Tile kaolin and the right are EPK. These two kaolins had almost the same drying shrinkages in this SHAB test, that suggests the same plasticity. And the EPK fires whiter. So it should make a better plastic porcelain, right? Not so. In reality, #6 Tile kaolin is far more plastic - EPK requires the addition of significant bentonite to equal it (bentonite is dirty and that compromises whiteness). And EPK fires less vitreous - when feldspar is added color darkens. And, although both have extremely high firing shrinkages, the EPK is much higher than the #6 Tile (even though it is not as vitreous). Bottom line: #6 Tile is a better kaolin for clay bodies.

Two batches of EP Kaolin tested quite differently in 2018

The EP kaolin has been mixed 70:30 with nepheline syenite. This creates a body that matures below cone 6. And it enables comparing the degree to which the two kaolins influence vitrification (and their contribution to fired color in a vitreous body). The darker one is more plastic, has higher drying shrinkage more soluble salts. These dry test bars were fired at cone 4-8 and had similar fired shrinkages and porosities. However, the one on the right fired whiter at all temperatures. These differences would impact the plasticity and drying shrinkage of bodies containing a significant percentage of the material. They would also influence the ability of this kaolin to suspend slurries.

EPK fired bar (top) vs Grolleg kaolin at cone 10R. Why shrinking more?

From these SHAB test bars EP kaolin appears to have a much higher fired shrinkage. But half of that happened during drying. Still, EPK shrinks 4% more during firing. Yet Grolleg produces more vitrified porcelains. The EPK bar also appears to be whiter. Yet in a porcelain body, Grolleg fires whiter. That higher drying shrinkage proves that EPK is much more plastic, right? Not really. Throwing porcelains containing either require plasticity augmentation using similar percentages of bentonite. What do we learn? To compare materials like this we need to see them "playing on the team", in a recipe working with other materials. Don't rely on material data sheets, do the testing in your recipes.

A 70:30 mix of EPK:Nepheline Syenite has gone to mush

This was plastic and moldable two days ago, now it is incredibly sticky. It is being compared with 5 other kaolin:nepheline mixes, none of them have reacted in this way. The material is sourced from two mines, the other mine does not do this.

Two kaolins, one cracks on bisque, the other does not

Both of these are mixed 70:30 kaolin:feldspar. Left is a fine particled kaolin, #6 Tile. Right a coarser particled, less plastic material, EPK. During forming, the larger particles line up concentric to the center better. This causes the body to shrink more along radius lines than along tangent, producing these cracks. Many of these were made and they all cracking like this.

Thrown pieces made from pure Grolleg and EP Kaolin

These have just been thrown on the wheel, which we find to be a foolproof method of comparing the plasticity of two clays. They were slurried up and dewatered to about the same moisture content and the same amount was thrown on a potter's wheel to compare the plasticity. While the Grolleg is stickier and dewaters a little slower, it is not nearly as plastic as EPK (which itself is not that plastic either). Curiously, New Zealand Halloysite is quite a bit less plastic than the Grolleg but it responds to plasticity augmentation (in porcelain recipes) just as well as Grolleg (similar amounts of bentonite producing similar plasticities). And, bodies containing EPK need about the same amount of bentonite to produce plasticity suitable for throwing large forms. So, the plasticity a porcelain appears to have by itself is not completely indicative of what it will contribute to a body. The EPK used here is the darker and more plastic of the two varieties we receive.

An effective test to judge the plasticity of a shipment of EP Kaolin

This shipment of light EPK (there are two versions, light and dark) is just barely plastic enough to make this cylinder with a slight belly. Notice the splits on the rim, these are indicative of the shortness (low plasticity). The cohesiveness of the material, as much as plasticity, gives it a toughness to survive the stresses of throwing (an unique aspect of EPK).

Links

Data

By Tony Hansen Follow me on

Got a Question?

Buy me a coffee and we can talk